Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
Publique un comentario Control coercitivo social como factor de riesgo de violencia de pareja / Social coercive control as a risk factor for intimate partner violence
Resumen
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el control coercitivo social como factor de riesgo de violencia en la pareja. Empleando la metodología cualitativa, se investigó el control coercitivo sobre las jóvenes universitarias de la Escuela Superior de Actopan de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, en México. En septiembre y octubre de 2017 se llevaron a cabo tres grupos focales de hombres y cuatro de mujeres, donde participaron 48 estudiantes de las licenciaturas en Psicología y Derecho.
Se encontró que los hombres despliegan control coercitivo sobre las jóvenes universitarias cuando ellas interactúan socialmente en el espacio público con otros hombres. Así, día a día se configura el riesgo en la integridad de las mujeres. Lo anterior demanda la necesidad de establecer acciones para desarrollar la empatía entre todas las personas involucradas, como estrategia para generar sensibilidad social en torno a la violencia en la pareja.
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to analyze coercive social control as a risk factor in intimate partner violence. Through qualitative methodology, the coercive control of the young university students of the Actopan High School, at the Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, Mexico, was investigated. In September and October 2017, 3 focus groups of men and 4 of women were carried out with a total of 48 undergraduate students in Law and Psychology.
It was found that men display coercive control over their partners, when the female university students interacted socially in a public place with other men. Thus, day by day the risk in the women’s integrity is configured. This situation demands the need to establish actions for developing empathy among all parts involved, as a strategy for generating social sensitivity surrounding partner violence.
Keywords: intimate partner violence; coercive social control; risk factor; female; university students.
Résumé : L’objectif de cette étude est d’analyser le contrôle coercitif social comme facteur de risque de violence entre partenaires intimes. Grâce à la méthodologie qualitative, le contrôle coercitif sur les jeunes étudiants universitaires de l’École Actopan, à l’Université autonome de l’État d’Hidalgo, au Mexique, a été étudié. En septembre et octobre 2017, 3 groupes de discussion d’hommes et 4 de femmes ont eu lieu, auxquels ont participé 48 étudiants de licence en psychologie et en droit.
Il a été constaté que les hommes exercent un contrôle coercitif sur les étudiantes lorsqu’elles interagissent socialement dans l’espace public avec d’autres hommes. Ainsi, jour après jour, le risque pour l’intégrité des femmes est configuré. Cela exige la nécessité d’établir des actions pour développer l’empathie entre toutes les personnes impliquées, comme stratégie pour générer une sensibilité sociale autour de la violence dans le couple.
Mots-clés : violence conjugale ; contrôle coercitif social ; facteur de risque ; femmes ; étudiants universitaires.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Abela, Jaime Andreú. 2002. Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: Una revisión actualizada. España: Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces / Universidad de Granada.
Aizpurua, Eva, Jennifer Copp, Jorge J. Ricarte y David Vázquez. 2017. «Controlling behaviors and intimate partner violence among women in Spain: An examination of individual, partner, and relationship risk factors for physical and psychological abuse». Journal of interpersonal violence 36 (1-2): 231-54. doi:10.1177/0886260517723744.
Álvarez-Gayou Jurgenson, José Luis. 2012. Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa: Fundamentos y metodología. México: Paidós.
Anderson, Kristin L. 2009. «Gendering coercive control». Violence Against Women 15 (12): 1444-57. doi:10.1177/1077801209346837.
Atteraya, Madhu Sudhan, Shreejana Gnawali e In Han Song. 2015. «Factors associated with intimate partner violence against married women in Nepal». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 30 (7): 1226-46. doi:10.1177/0886260514539845.
Capaldi, Deborah M., y Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling. 2012. «Informing intimate partner violence prevention efforts: Dyadic, developmental, and contextual considera¬tions». Prevention Science, 13: 323-8. doi:10.1007/s11121-012-0309-y.
Chong, Eddie S. K., Winnie W. S. Mak y Mabel M. F. Kwong. 2013. «Risk and protective factors of same-sex intimate partner violence in Hong Kong». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28 (7): 1476-97. doi:10.1177/0886260512468229.
Culbreth, Rachel, Monica H. Swahn, Laura F. Salazar, Rogers Kasirye y Tina Musuya. 2019. «Intimate partner violence and associated risk factors among youth in the slums of Kampala». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36 (21-22): NP11736-NP11755. doi:10.1177/0886260519889927.
Djikanovic, Bosiljka, Henrica A. F. M. Jansen y Stanislava Otasevic. 2010. «Factors associated with intimate partner violence against women in Serbia: A cross-sectional study». Journal Epidemiology & Community Health 64 (8): 728-35. doi:10.1136/jech. 2009.090415.
Dutton, Mary Ann, y Lisa A. Goodman. 2005. «Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization». Sex Roles, 52: 743-56. doi:10.1007/s11199-005- 4196-6.
EUPATI (European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation). 2022. «Factor de riesgo». Glosario. https://toolbox.eupati.eu/glossary/factor-de-riesgo/?lang=es.
Fei, Luo, Judith Ann Warner y Heather Alaniz. 2020. «Intimate partner violence among nontraditional Hispanic college students: An exploratory study». Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 18 (4): 341-59. doi:10.1080/15377938.2020.1812461.
Fleury-Steiner, Ruth E., y Susan L. Miller. 2020. «Reproductive coercion and perceptions of future violence». Violence Against Women 26 (10): 1228-41. doi:10.1177/1077801219856107.
Frye, Victoria, Jennifer Manganello, Jacquelyn C. Campbell, Benita Walton-Moss y Susan Wilt. 2006. «The distribution of and factors associated with intimate terrorism and situational couple violence among a population-based sample of urban women in the United States». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 21 (10): 1286-313. doi:10.1177/0886260506291658.
Giordano, Peggy C., Jennifer E. Copp, Monica A. Longmore y Wendy D. Manning. 2016. «Anger, control, and intimate partner violence in young adulthood». Journal of Family Violence, 31: 1-13. doi:10.1007/s10896-015-9753-3.
Home Office. 2015. Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship: Statutory guidance framework. United Kingdom: Home Office. https://assets. publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/482528/Controlling_or_coercive_behaviour_-_statutory_guidance.pdf.
Hu, Ran, Jia Xue, Kai Lin, Ivan Y. Sun y Xiying Wang. 2021. «Bidirectional intimate partner violence among Chinese women: Patterns and risk factors». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36 (21-22): NP12252-NP12278. doi:10.1177/0886260519888523.
Johnson, Holly, Li Eriksson, Paul Mazerolle y Richard Wortley. 2019. «Intimate femicide: The role of coercive control». Feminist Criminology 14 (1): 3-23. doi:10.1177/1557085117701574.
Katz, Colleen C., Mark E. Courtney y Beth Sapiro. 2017. «Emancipated foster youth and intimate partner violence: An exploration of risk and protective factors». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 35 (23-24): 5469-99. doi:10.1177/0886260517720735.
Kouyoumdjian, Fiona G., Liviana M. Calzavara, Susan J. Bondy, Patricia O’Campo, David Serwadda, Fred Nalugoda, Joseph Kagaayi, Godfrey Kigozi, Maria Wawer y Ronald Gray. 2013. «Risk factors for intimate partner violence in women in the Rakai Community Cohort Study, Uganda, from 2000 to 2009». Public Health, 13. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-566.
LeSuer, Will. 2020. «An international study of the contextual effects of gender inequality on intimate partner sexual violence against women students». Feminist Criminology 15 (1): 97-118. doi:10.1177/1557085119842652.
Mayorga-Nóblega, Magaly. 2012. «Risk and protective factors for physical and emotional intimate partner violence against women in a community of Lima, Peru». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27 (18): 3644-59. doi:10.1177/0886260512447522.
Myhill, Andy, y Katrin Hohl. 2019. «The “Golden Thread”: Coercive control and risk assessment for domestic violence». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34 (21-22): 4477-97. doi:10.1177/0886260516675464.
Nevala, Sami. 2017. «Coercive control and its impact on intimate partner violence through the lens of an EU-Wide survey on violence against women». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 32 (12): 1792-820. doi:10.1177/0886260517698950.
OIJ (Organismo Internacional de Juventud), y aecid (Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo). 2008. Tratado internacional de derechos de la juventud: Convención Iberoamericana de los Derechos de los Jóvenes. Badajoz, España: oij / aecid. https://oij.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CIDJ-A6-ESP-VERTICAL.pdf.
Policastro, Christina, y Mary A. Finn. 2021. «Coercive control in intimate relationships: Differences across age and sex». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36 (3-4): 1520-43. doi:10.1177/0886260517743548.
Popkin, Susan, Chantal Hailey, Janine Zweig, Nan Astone, Reed Jordan, Leah Gordon y Jay Silverman. 2019. «Coercive sexual environments: Development and validation of a scale». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34 (1): 27-49. doi:10.1177/0886260516639581.
Sabri, Bushra, Nkiru Nnawulezi, Veronica P. S. Njie-Carr, Jill Messing, Allison Ward- Lasher, Carmen Álvarez y Jacquelyn C. Campbell. 2018. «Multilevel risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence among African, Asian, and Latina immigrant and refugee women: Perceptions of effective safety planning interventions». Race & Social Problems, 10: 348-65. doi:10.1007/s12552-018-9247-z.
Segato, Rita Laura. 2014. Las nuevas formas de la guerra y el cuerpo de las mujeres. Puebla: Pez en el Árbol.
-2016. La guerra contra las mujeres. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
-2018. Contrapedagogías de la crueldad. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.
Swan, Laura E. T., Annelise Mennicke, Amy Magnuson y Lindsey MacConnie. 2021. «Social risk factors for interpersonal violence victimization among college students: Findings from a mixed-gender sample». Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 30 (5): 605-24. doi:10.1080/10926771.2020.1832170.
Taşkale, Nermin, y Gonca Soygüt. 2017. «Risk factors for women’s intimate partner violence victimization: An examination from the perspective of the schema therapy model». Journal of Family Violence, 32: 3-12. doi:10.1007/s10896-016-9855-6.
Tu, Xiao-Wen, y Chaohua Lou. 2017. «Risk factors associated with current intimate partner violence at individual and relationship levels: A cross-sectional study among married rural migrant women in Shanghai, China». BMJ Open 7: e012264. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012264.
UAEH (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo). 2018. Anuario Estadístico 2017. Hidalgo: UAEH. http://sgc.uaeh.edu.mx/planeacion/images/estadisticas/publicaciones/Anuario%202017%20web%20final.pdf.
Verschuere, Bruno, Joan van Horn y Nannet Buitelaar. 2021. «The role of control in intimate partner violence: A study in Dutch forensic outpatients». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36 (7-8): 3400-10. doi:10.1177/0886260518775152.
Wang, Ling, Qinglu Wu, y Anna Wai-Man Choi. 2020. «Negative emotions as risk factors for self-directed violence and intimate partner violence in Chinese college students». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 35 (19-20): 3886-912. doi:10.1177/0886260517713225.
WHO (World Health Organization), y London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 2010. Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: Taking action and generating evidence. Ginebra: who. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44350/9789241564007_eng.pdf;jsessionid=72BEB50B2C8645 8253BA4E317A33619F?sequence=1.
Yok-Fong, Paat, y Christine Markham. 2019. «The roles of family factors and relationship dynamics on dating violence victimization and perpetration among college men and women in emerging adulthood». Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34 (1): 81-114. doi:10.1177/0886260516640544.
Yok-Fong, Paat, Max C. E. Orezzoli y Thenral Mangadu. 2021. «Partner violence among female students attending historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) in emerging adulthood». Victims & Offenders 16 (4): 519-39. doi:10.1080/ 15564886.2020.1818152.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22134/trace.82.2022.828
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Trace
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
Mapa del sitio
Contactos
Menciones legales y créditos
Flujo de sindicación RSS
Adherimos a Revues.org
Acceso reservado
ISSN electrónico 2007-2392